Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 16;10:126. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-10-126

Table 3.

Effect of Diabetes status, race and diet on APP*

Model 1 Carbohydrate/Fiber B-unstandardized coefficient (95% CI) SE P
Diabetes (yes) 0.744 (0.436,1.05) 0.145 < 0.001
RACE [F(2,15) = 0.539] - - 0.594
MA 0.060 (0.015, 0.106) 0.021 0.012
BNH 0.059 (0.019, 0.099) 0.019 0.006
WNH (reference)
Diabetes*RACE [F(2,15) = 7.39] - - 0.006
Diabetes (yes) MA -0.054(-0.134, 0.026) 0.038 0.171
Diabetes(yes) BNH -0.112(-0.179, -0.045 0.032 0.003
Diabetes(yes) WNH (reference) - - -
CHO (gm) 0.051 (-0.005, 0.106) 0.026 0.071
Fiber (gm) -0.014 (-0.029, -0.0003) 0.007 0.050
Kcal -0.002(-0.004, 0.001) 0.001 0.161
Diabetes (yes) *CHO‡‡ -0.118 (-0.178, -0.058) 0.028 0.001
Current Smoker (yes) 0.022 (0.001, 0.043) 0.010 0.041
Age (yrs) 0.008 (0.007,0.009) 0.0001 < 0.001
Gender (male) 0.022 (-0.014, 0.058) 0.017 0.208
BMI (m/kg2) 0.045(-0.024,0.114) 0.032 0.182

Model summary: R2 = 0.184; F(13,4) = 36.5, p < 0.001

Model 2 MUFA/SFA B (95% CI) SE P
Diabetes (Yes) 0.299 (0.195, 0.403) 0.049 < 0.001
RACE [F(2,15) = 0.351] 0.710
MA 0.058 (0.012, 0.104) 0.022 0.017
BNH 0.065 (0.022, 0.107) 0.020 0.005
WNH (reference)
Diabetes*RACE [F(2,15) = 7.12] - - 0.007
Diabetes (yes) MA -0.063(-0.137, 0.001) 0.035 0.088
Diabetes (yes) BNH -0.112(-0.179,-0.044) 0.032 0.003
Diabetes (yes) WNH (reference)
MUFA -0.019(- 0.040,0.002) 0.010 0.072
SFA 0.010(-0.006,0.026) 0.008 0.186
Kcal 0.001(-0.002, 0.003) 0.001 0.547
Diabetes (yes) *MUFA‡‡ -0.035 (-0.055, -0.014) 0.010 0.011
Current Smoker (Yes) 0.024 (0.004, 0.045) 0.010 0.020
Age (yrs) 0.008 (0.007, 0.009) 0.0001 < 0.001
Gender (male) 0.021(-0.013, 0.056) 0.016 0.208
BMI (m/kg2) 0.054(-0.18,0.126) 0.034 0.134
Model summary: R2 = 0.184; F(13, 4) = 72.9, p < 0.001

Abbreviations: APP = arterial pulse pressure; MA = Mexican Americans; BNH = Black, non-Hispanics; WHN = White, non-Hispanics; MUFA = monounsaturated fatty acids; SFA = saturated fatty acids; Kcal = kilocalories per day (energy intake); BMI = body mass index.

* Complete data were available for N = 4236 participants and sample weights were applied. BMI was natural log-transformed and Kcal was transformed by the square root.

MA and BNH are compared to WNH regarding APP and have higher APP than WNH (positive coefficient).

MA and BNH with diabetes are compared to WNH with diabetes and have lower APP (negative coefficients, significant for MA, only)

‡‡ All participants with diabetes that consume higher CHO and higher MUFA have lower APP than those without diabetes.