Table 2. Variance explained in abdominal subcutaneous fat mass and intra-abdominal fat mass by body mass index, waist circumference and their combination in each of the pooled samples.
Canada+Turku # | Helsinki/Turku ¤ | Canada/Helsinki/Turku∥ | ||||
ASFM | ASFM | ASFM | ||||
Crude | Adjusted* | Crude | Adjusted* | Crude | Adjusted* | |
R2 | R2 | R2 | R2 | R2 | R2 | |
BMI | 0.47 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.76 | 0.56 | 0.70 |
WC | 0.11 | 0.56 | 0.43 | 0.73 | 0.29 | 0.66 |
BMI+WC | 0.49 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.78 | 0.57 | 0.72 |
Abbreviations: ASFM, abdominal subcutaneous fat mass. BMI, body mass index- IAFM, intra-abdominal fat mass. R2, adjusted squared multiple correlation coefficients. WC, waist circumference.
Regression models adjusted for study center, sex, age, type 2 diabetes status.
Intra-abdominal fat mass = intra-peritoneal fat mass+retroperitoneal fat mass.
Intra-abdominal fat mass = intra-peritoneal fat mass.
Intra-abdominal fat mass = intra-peritoneal fat mass+retroperitoneal fat mass in Canada and intra-peritoneal mass in Helsinki and Turku.
p<0.05 for WC and BMI in all models, except for BMI in † where p>0.05.