Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 26.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Intern Med. 2010 Oct 11;171(3):204–210. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.394

Table 2.

Multivariable Logistic Regression Model of Factors Associated With Hospice Use Among 14 521 Men Dying of Prostate Cancer

Characteristic OR (95% CI)
Age 1.00 (0.99–1.00)
Ethnicity vs white
 Hispanic 1.00 (0.83–1.19)
 African American 0.78 (0.68–0.88)
 Other 0.59 (0.48–0.73)
Charlson comorbidity index vs 0
 1 0.68 (0.62–0.74)
 2 0.63 (0.57–0.70)
 ≥3 0.49 (0.44–0.55)
Primary treatment, vs primary androgen deprivation
 Radiation prostatectomy 1.28 (1.10–1.50)
 Radiation therapy 1.37 (1.26–1.49)
% Of census tract with >high school education vs ≤high school education 1.15 (1.03–1.28)
Median census tract household income vs
 <$38 500
 $38 500–$48 499 1.12 (1.01–1.24)
 $48 500–$62 000 1.21 (1.07–1.37)
 >$62 000 1.19 (1.03–1.37)
With partner vs without partner 1.23 (1.14–1.32)
Distant stage at diagnosis vs localized/locoregional 1.13 (1.04–1.23)
Year of death vs 1992 1.12 (1.11–1.14)
SEER region vs Los Angeles
 San Francisco 1.22 (1.03–1.45)
 Connecticut 1.05 (0.91–1.22)
 Detroit 2.50 (2.17–2.87)
 Hawaii 1.34 (1.01–1.77)
 Iowa 2.01 (1.72–2.35)
 New Mexico 1.55 (1.27–1.88)
 Seattle 1.17 (1.00–1.38)
 Utah 1.48 (1.23–1.78)
 Atlanta 1.69 (1.39–2.05)
 San Jose 1.33 (1.07–1.65)
 Rural Georgia 1.78 (0.99–3.22)
 Kentucky 1.65 (1.19–2.29)
 Louisiana 1.53 (1.08–2.16)
 New Jersey 1.17 (0.91–1.52)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results.