Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 16;2012:904916. doi: 10.1155/2012/904916

Table 2.

Patient satisfaction with HIV screeninga, n = 393.

Screening Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor
n % (95% CI) n % (95% CI) n % (95% CI) n % (95% CI) n % (95% CI)
Opt-in
 All 130/206 63.1 (56.5–69.7) 30/206 14.6 (9.7–19.4) 36/206 17.5 (12.3–22.7) 9/206 4.37 (1.6–7.2) 1/206 0.5 (0–1.4)b
 Negative 129/198 65.2 (58.5–71.8) 29/198 14.7 (9.7–19.6) 31/198 15.7 (10.6–20.7) 8/198 4.04 (1.3–6.8) 1/198 0.5 (0–1.5)b
 Positive 1/8 12.5 (0–35.4)a 1/8 12.5 (0–35.4)a 5/8 62.6 (29.0–96.1) 1/8 12.50 (0–35.4)b 0/8
Opt-out
 All 91/187 48.7 (41.5–55.8) 54/187 28.9 (22.4–35.4) 30/187 16.0 (10.8–21.3) 11/187 5.9 (2.5–9.3) 1/187 0.5 (0–1.6)b
 Negative 83/159 52.2 (44.4–60.0) 45/159 28.3 (21.3–35.3) 21/159 13.2 (8.0–18.5) 10/159 6.3 (2.5–10.1) 0/159
 Positive 8/28 28.6 (11.8–45.3) 9/28 32.1 (14.8–49.4) 9/28 32.1 (14.8–49.4) 1/28 3.6 (0–10.4) 1/28 3.6 (0–10.4)b

aThe global index of satisfaction was determined by asking the patient, “Overall, how would you rate the rapid HIV testing program in the emergency department?”

b1-sided, 97.5% CI.

Abbreviation: CI: confidence interval.