Table 4.
Sample ID | Feature selection P < 0.05 | Feature selection P < 0.01 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Predictive Index Percentile1 |
Prediction For Pretreatment Sample2 |
Overall Prediction3 |
Predictive Index Percentile |
Prediction for Pretreatment Sample |
Overall Prediction |
||
1 pre | 39% | low | incorrect | 35% | low | incorrect | |
1 post | 22% | 24% | |||||
2 pre | 48% | low | correct | 49% | low | correct | |
2 post | 79% | 77% | |||||
3 pre | 55% | low | correct | 46% | low | correct | |
3 post | 73% | 77% | |||||
4 pre | 13% | low | correct | 24% | low | correct | |
4 post | 72% | 73% | |||||
5 pre | 31% | low | correct | 33% | low | correct | |
5 post | 48% | 46% | |||||
6 pre | 13% | low | correct | 27% | low | correct | |
6 post | 16% | 66% | |||||
7 pre | 7% | low | correct | 12% | low | correct | |
7 post | 66% | 57% | |||||
8 pre | 52% | low | incorrect | 50% | low | incorrect | |
8 post | 17% | 24% |
1The predictive index was computed for each sample by this supervised principal component method, where a high value of the predictive index corresponds to a rapid progression after chemotherapy (i.e., short TTP). If the predictive index of a sample in the test set corresponded to the median predictive index of the training set, the sample was assigned a 50% predictive index.
2The risk was predicted low, if predictive index percentile of the pretreatment sample was less than 67%
3The prediction was considered correct if post-treatment samples were assigned a higher predictive index than pre-treatment samples.