Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec;1(4):517–528. doi: 10.1002/ece3.45

Table 1.

Generalized linear models (Poisson errors) of mammal occurrence against percent cover of habitat types in the surrounding landscape. Habitat was measured at 20 different spatial scales; the best-supported model (highest AIC weight) among 20 models is shown for each species

Species common name n* Mass (g)** Characteristic scale Null deviance df Residual deviance df
Cougar 8 66,508 250 43.29 65 24.72 62
Wolf 8 43,205 3,000 38.64 65 18.01 61
Flying squirrel 9 105 4,500 50.28 65 38.10 63
Coyote 11 14,061 4,250 55.54 65 34.61 63
Lynx 15 10,149 1,250 66.82 65 47.94 62
Ermine 17 81 5,000 97.47 65 63.54 63
Hare 19 1,497 5,000 72.54 65 58.78 62
Fox 21 5,193 250 77.72 65 63.56 62
Red squirrel 39 191 2,000 77.80 65 58.31 63
Fisher 48 3,118 500 188.92 119 147.88 115
Wolverine 48 12,303 5,000 183.58 119 104.94 116
Marten 62 839 4,500 164.75 119 118.26 115
*

n = number of sites at which the species was detected.

**

Masses are rounded from Holling (1992).