Table 1.
Results of 4-node biological network motifs in the DIP Core network
| Algorithm | Motif included in | GO Clustering score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complex | Function | BP | MF | CC | |
| ESU | .13 | .205 | .64 | .51 | .61 |
| RAND-ESU | .13 | .208 | .65 | .28 | .46 |
| MFINDER | .15 | .299 | .74 | .57 | .71 |
| EDGEGO-BNM | .21 | .479 | .85 | .70 | .80 |
| EDGEBETWEENNESS-BNM | .28 | .392 | .78 | .60 | .79 |
| NMFGO-BNM | .18 | .360 | .78 | .61 | .75 |
| NMF-BNM | .15 | .230 | .68 | .54 | .64 |
| VOLTAGE-BNM | .26 | .330 | .77 | .59 | .75 |
EDGEBETWEENNESS-BNM performs best in 'motif included in complex' measure while EDGEGO-BNM performs best in other measures.