Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 29;5(Suppl 9):S119. doi: 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S9-S119

Table 1.

Overall ability of the four rare variant methods to identify genes as significantly associated with the phenotype

Method Nominal α = 0.05 Nominal α = 0.005

Total number of significant associations Number of significant associations that are actually causal True discoveries (%) Total number of significant associations Number of significant associations that are actually causal True discoveries (%)
Only SNPs with MAF < 5%
WS 281.0 5.69 2.03 52.5 1.56 2.97
CMAT 201.4 4.42 2.19 38.4 1.31 3.44
CMC 256.5 3.80 1.48 38.2 0.92 2.41
PR 184.6 4.46 2.41 27.9 1.17 4.20
All SNPs
WS 348.7 6.81 1.95 76.1 2.05 2.69
CMAT 294.9 4.63 1.57 63.8 1.46 2.28
CMC 361.1 5.16 1.43 64.6 1.23 1.90
PR 285.6 4.74 1.66 53.7 1.39 2.59
Nonsynonymous SNPs only
WS 206.1 5.25 2.54 42.3 1.78 4.20
CMAT 173.3 4.19 2.42 35.7 1.44 4.03
CMC 223.3 4.99 2.23 38.5 1.33 3.46
PR 168.7 3.88 2.30 29.4 1.38 4.69

All values are averaged over 200 replicates. WS, weighted sum; CMAT, cumulative minor allele test; CMC, combined multivariate and collapsing; PR, proportion regression.