Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 4;29(3):237–242. doi: 10.1007/s10815-011-9691-9

Table 2.

Pregnancy outcomes in recipients treated with vaginal progesterone gel versus intramuscular progesterone

Pregnancy outcome Descriptive statistica Vaginal progesterone gel (n = 105) Intramuscular progesterone (n = 120)
Positive serum hCG rate n (%) 65 (61.9) 71 (59.2)
p value 0.685
Difference 2.7
95% CI −10.9, 16.4
Implantation rate n (%) 89/203 (43.8) 91/245 (37.1)
p value 0.175
Difference 6.7
95% CI −2.9, 16.3
Clinical pregnancy rate n (%) 61 (58.1) 64 (53.3)
p value 0.503
Difference 4.8
95% CI −9.1, 18.6
Delivery rate n (%) 54 (51.4) 58 (48.3)
p value 0.689
Difference 3.1
95% CI −10.9, 17.1
Total pregnancy loss rate n (%) 11/65 (16.9) 13/71 (18.3)
p value 1.000
Difference −1.4
95% CI −15.7, 12.9

CI confidence interval.

ap value based on Fisher’s exact test.