Table 3.
Demographic Information
| WP (teachers, n = 12) (students, n = 169) |
CAL (teachers, n = 11) students,n = 155 |
control (teachers, n = 8) (students, n = 118) |
||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | % | (n) | M | (SD) | % | (n) | M | (SD) | % | (n) | M | (SD) | χ2 | p | F | p |
| Teachers | ||||||||||||||||
| Male | 0 | (0) | 0.0 | (0) | 0.0 | (0) | ||||||||||
| Race | 2.27 | 0.32 | ||||||||||||||
| African American | 25.5 | (3) | 18.2 | (2) | 0.0 | (0) | ||||||||||
| Caucasian | 75 | (9) | 81.8 | (9) | 100.0 | (8) | ||||||||||
| Years Teaching | 11.00 | (9.42) | 20.27 | (10.24) | 20.63 | (10.54) | 3.26 | 0.05 | ||||||||
| Students | ||||||||||||||||
| Male | 50.3 | (85) | 43.2 | (67) | 47.5 | (56) | 1.78 | 0.41 | ||||||||
| Race | 2.61 | 0.96 | ||||||||||||||
| African American | 33.9 | (57) | 36.1 | (56) | 32.2 | (38) | ||||||||||
| Caucasian | 37.5 | (63) | 34.9 | (54) | 38.1 | (45) | ||||||||||
| Asian | 4.8 | (8) | 3.2 | (5) | 5.9 | (7) | ||||||||||
| Hispanic | 17.9 | (30) | 19.4 | (30) | 15.2 | (18) | ||||||||||
| Other | 5.9 | (10) | 6.4 | (10) | 7.6 | (9) | ||||||||||
| Subsidized Lunch | 75.1 | (127) | 82.6 | (128) | 76.3 | (90) | 2.53 | 0.28 | ||||||||
| Retained | 6.5 | (11) | 7.1 | (11) | 10.2 | (12) | 1.46 | 0.48 | ||||||||
| Measures to asses comparability | ||||||||||||||||
| *Addition Fact Fluency | 9.54 | (4.91) | 9.85 | (5.18) | 9.31 | (4.88) | 0.40 | 0.67 | ||||||||
| *Single-Digit Story Problems | 8.11 | (4.11) | 8.03 | (3.76) | 7.52 | (3.61) | 0.91 | 0.40 | ||||||||
| Vanderbilt Story Problems | 9.49 | (6.03) | 9.89 | (5.39) | 8.66 | (5.30) | 1.63 | 0.20 | ||||||||
| Math Status | 1.31 | 0.97 | ||||||||||||||
| Low in word problems | 20.7 | (35) | 20.0 | (31) | 22.0 | (26) | ||||||||||
| Low in calculations | 11.8 | (20) | 10.3 | (16) | 11.9 | (14) | ||||||||||
| Low in both | 18.9 | (32) | 17.4 | (27) | 20.3 | (24) | ||||||||||
Note
*
These measures were also used to screen at-risk status.