Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 Jan 3;111(4):607–628. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.12.001

Table 6.

Mediation Analyses to test the Proposed Causal Mechanism

Unknown Difference Set
Unknown Compared Set
Unknown Referent Set
Model B SE p PC B SE p PC B SE p PC



Step 1 Treatment on Outcome (Difference Problem Subtest)
     Constant 1.99 0.26 < 0.001 5.00 0.33 < 0.001 4.31 0.25 < 0.001
     Difference Problem covariate 0.54 0.05 < 0.001 0.51 0.04 < 0.001 0.52 0.05 < 0.001
     Treatment −0.89 0.21 < 0.001 c −1.06 0.38 0.008 c −1.47 0.32 < 0.001 c
Step 2 Treatment on Mediator (Relational Tasks)
     Constant 19.39 0.78 < 0.001 19.39 0.78 < 0.001 19.39 0.78 < 0.001
     Treatment −2.09 0.97 0.041 a −2.09 0.97 0.041 a −2.09 0.97 0.041 a
Step 3 Treatment and Mediator (Relational Tasks) on Outcome (Difference Problem Subtest)
     Constant 1.01 0.25 < 0.001 0.99 1.19 0.41 1.65 0.68 0.023
     Difference Problem covariate 0.39 0.04 < 0.001 0.33 0.05 < 0.001 0.39 0.05 < 0.001
     Relational Tasks posttest 0.073 0.01 < 0.001 b 0.113 0.06 < 0.001 b 0.095 0.018 < 0.001 b
     Treatment −0.85 0.19 < 0.001 c' −0.62 0.33 0.073 c' −1.3 0.29 < 0.001 c'

Note. PC = the path coefficient relevant to the mediation analysis in Figure 1. To assess the significance of the indirect effect for unknown difference and referent sets, we looked at paths a*b to assess the interaction.