Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2011 Dec 17;60(1):728–737. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.013

Table 1.

Estimated differences of coefficients of cross-correlation between significant and minimal fatigue stages (i.e. significant-minimal) and their standard errors based on linear regression models. The statistical tests were performed to evaluate whether FC is greater in significant than minimal fatigue stages for sub-region ROIs in the PM/SMA and PFC not shown in Fig. 7, 8 and 9.

ROI Estimate Std Err ROI Estimate Std Err
Premotor Cortex Sub Regions (Mayka et al., 2006)
Left PMd 0.0568 0.0006 Right PMd 0.0326 0.0006
Left PMv 0.0388 0.0005 Right PMv 0.0543 0.0006
Left preSMA_L 0.0642 0.0009 Right preSMA 0.0493 0.001
Left SMA proper 0.0302 0.0011 Right SMA proper 0.035 0.001
Prefrontal Cortex Sub Regions (Tzourio-Mazoyer et al., 2002)
Left mPFC 0.0886 0.0005 Right mPFC 0.104 0.0005
Left DLPFC 0.0704 0.0004 Right DLPFC 0.0702 0.0003
Left VLPFC 0.1162 0.0006 Right VLPFC 0.0871 0.0006
Left omPFC 0.1334 0.0029 Right omPFC 0.1634 0.0027

All tests exhibited significant differences in FC between the two fatigue stages (P<0.001 for all ROIs). PMd=dorsal premotor, PMv=ventral premotor, preSMA=rostral SMA, SMA proper=caudal SMA, mPFC= medial PFC, DLPFC=dorsolateral PFC, VLPFC=vetrolateral PFC, and omPFC=orbito-medial PFC.