Table 1.
Estimated differences of coefficients of cross-correlation between significant and minimal fatigue stages (i.e. significant-minimal) and their standard errors based on linear regression models. The statistical tests were performed to evaluate whether FC is greater in significant than minimal fatigue stages for sub-region ROIs in the PM/SMA and PFC not shown in Fig. 7, 8 and 9.
ROI | Estimate | Std Err | ROI | Estimate | Std Err |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Premotor Cortex Sub Regions (Mayka et al., 2006) | |||||
Left PMd | 0.0568 | 0.0006 | Right PMd | 0.0326 | 0.0006 |
Left PMv | 0.0388 | 0.0005 | Right PMv | 0.0543 | 0.0006 |
Left preSMA_L | 0.0642 | 0.0009 | Right preSMA | 0.0493 | 0.001 |
Left SMA proper | 0.0302 | 0.0011 | Right SMA proper | 0.035 | 0.001 |
Prefrontal Cortex Sub Regions (Tzourio-Mazoyer et al., 2002) | |||||
Left mPFC | 0.0886 | 0.0005 | Right mPFC | 0.104 | 0.0005 |
Left DLPFC | 0.0704 | 0.0004 | Right DLPFC | 0.0702 | 0.0003 |
Left VLPFC | 0.1162 | 0.0006 | Right VLPFC | 0.0871 | 0.0006 |
Left omPFC | 0.1334 | 0.0029 | Right omPFC | 0.1634 | 0.0027 |
All tests exhibited significant differences in FC between the two fatigue stages (P<0.001 for all ROIs). PMd=dorsal premotor, PMv=ventral premotor, preSMA=rostral SMA, SMA proper=caudal SMA, mPFC= medial PFC, DLPFC=dorsolateral PFC, VLPFC=vetrolateral PFC, and omPFC=orbito-medial PFC.