. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Dec 22;55(1):105–124. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0325)

Table 3.

The results of two-ways ANOVA for consonant bimodal advantage. The analysis was performed with two factors, listening Mode and SNR for each group. The same analysis was performed with two factors, Group and SNR between groups. Significant effect was indicated with bold face.

Consonant feature			PTA ≥ 55 dB HL	PTA < 55 dB HL	PTA ≥ 55 dB HL vs. PTA < 55 dB HL
Voicing	Voiced	Mode	F(1,8)=6.6, p>.05	F(1,8)=18.4, p<.01	Group	F(1,16)=5, p<.05
	Voiced	SNR	F(2,8)=23.3, p<.001	F(2,8)=39, p<.001	SNR	F(2,16)=.3, p>.05
	Unvoiced	Mode	F(1,8)=2.8, p>.05	F(1,8)=5.4, p>.05	Group	F(1,16)=2.1, p>.05
	Unvoiced	SNR	F(2,8)=14.8, p<.005	F(2,8)=11, p<.005	SNR	F(2,16)=4, p<.05

Manner	Stop	Mode	F(1,8)=.8, p>.05	F(1,8)=5, p<.05	Group	F(1,16)=1.4, p>.05
	Stop	SNR	F(2,8)=40, p<.001	F(2,8)=53, p<.001	SNR	F(2,16)=1.5, p>.05
	Nasal	Mode	F(1,8)=.1, p>.05	F(1,8)=3, p>.05	Group	F(1,16)=1, p>.05
	Nasal	SNR	F(2,8)=7.3, p<.01	F(2,8)=30, p<.001	SNR	F(2,16)=1.7, p>.05
	Fricative	Mode	F(1,8)=5.2, p>.05	F(1,8)=6.8, p>.05	Group	F(1,16)=1, p>.05
	Fricative	SNR	F(2,8)=12.6, p<.005	F(2,8)=7.5, p<.01	SNR	F(2,16)=.6, p>.05
	Affricate	Mode	F(1,8)=.5, p>.05	F(1,8)=8.6, p<.05	Group	F(1,16)=4.6, p<.05
	Affricate	SNR	F(2,8)=9, p<.005	F(2,8)=9, p<.005	SNR	F(2,16)=.4, p>.05

Place	Front	Mode	F(1,8)=1.4, p>.05	F(1,8)=14, p<.05	Group	F(1,16)=1.5, p>.05
	Front	SNR	F(2,8)=17, p<.001	F(2,8)=28, p<.001	SNR	F(2,16)=.8, p>.05
	Middle	Mode	F(1,8)=1.7, p>.05	F(1,8)=9.4, p<.05	Group	F(1,16)=3, p>.05
	Middle	SNR	F(2,8)=23, p<.001	F(2,8)=11, p<.005	SNR	F(2,16)=2, p>.05
	Back	Mode	F(1,8)=1.1, p>.05	F(1,8)=6.3, p<.05	Group	F(1,16)=7.2, p<.05
	Back	SNR	F(2,8)=10.2, p<.005	F(2,8)=38, p<.001	SNR	F(2,16)=2, p>.05