Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2011 Nov 20;37(4):521–523. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.11.013

Table 2.

Goodness-of–Fit Statistics for Three Invariance Models

Model NFI NNFI CFI Δ CFI RMSEA
Gender
 Configural Invariance .965 .936 .966 .131
 Pattern Identity Invariance .963 .946 .964 −.002 .121
 Strong Factorial Invariance .959 .946 .961 −.003 .112
Race
 Configural Invariance .968 .943 .969 .114
 Pattern Identity Invariance .966 .953 .969 .000 .104
 Strong Factorial Invariance .958 .946 .961 −.008 .104
Ethnicity
 Configural Invariance .969 .945 .971 .118
 Pattern Identity Invariance .968 .953 .969 −.002 .109
 Strong Factorial Invariance .939 .918 .941 −.028 .140
School
 Configural Invariance .972 .950 .973 .117
 Pattern Identity Invariance .972 .959 .973 .000 .106
 Strong Factorial Invariance .970 .961 .972 −.001 .095