Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunol. 2012 Jan 30;188(5):2146–2155. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1004120

Figure 2. Detailed analysis of targeted DC subsets.

Figure 2

1μg IgG2a control or anti-DEC-205 mAb were injected intradermally into the ears of C57BL/6 mice. The injection site was immediately treated with imiquimod cream, or left untreated. At the indicated time points, targeting antibody was detected on permeabilised lymph nodes cells by anti-rat IgG / APC, and the different subset of DCs were distinguished by staining for CD11c, CD11b, CCR7, CD8α and Langerin. (A, upper panel) Gating strategy for CD11c+ CCR7neg CD8αneg CD11b-/+ LN DCs, CD11c+ CCR7neg CD8α+ CD11blow LN DCs, CD11c+ CCR7+ CD8αneg Langerinneg CD11b+ dermal DCs and CD11c+ CCR7+ CD8αneg Langerin+ CD11b+ LCs / dermal DCs. (A, lower panel) Detection of DEC-205 targeting antibody (empty histogram) and IgG2a isotype control (filled histogram) on four different DC subsets. Results are representative of two independent experiments. (B) Percentage of CD11b+ cells among the four different DC subsets, irrespective of targeting. (C) Relative proportions of each DC subset in untreated mice or mice treated with imiquimod cream. Data from (B) and (C) are pooled from two independent experiments, with at least 2 mice per condition. Significance values apply to the comparison of identical populations (i.e., same color columns) with or without imiquimod treatment.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure