Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 1;112(4):671–680. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00818.2011

Table 1.

Tidal volume and flow validation study data

Mouse No. of Breaths Mean Vt, μl Mean Difference, μl SD, μl Mean Difference 95% CI Relative Mean Difference, % CV, %
Vt
1 142 193.2 0.0 7.2 −1.2–1.2 0.0 3.7
2 189 180.4 −6.2 4.8 −6.9–−5.5 −3.5 2.7
3 131 163.8 7.9 4.8 7.1–8.8 4.8 3.0
4 102 195.9 −8.6 4.4 −9.5–−7.7 −4.4 2.3
Total 564 182.6 −1.8 8.9 −2.5–−1.1 −1.0 4.9
Phase No. of Breaths (5 Per Mouse) Mean Flow, μl/s Mean Difference, μl/s SD, μl/s Mean Difference Relative Mean CV, %
Tidal airflow
Inspiration 20 845.1 −40.5 264.9 −49.5–−31.5 3.7 24.4
Expiration 20 −761.8 −201.7 698.5 −219.4–−184.0 −30.9 107.0

Tidal airflow data set consists of 5 consecutive breaths from 4 individual mice (20 breaths total). Top: mean Vt, mean tracheal tidal volume; mean difference, mean tracheal Vt minus mean whole body plethysmography Vt; SD, SD of mean difference; relative mean difference, mean difference/mean tracheal tidal volume; CV, coefficient of variation = mean difference/mean tracheal Vt. Bottom: mean flow, mean tracheal airflow; mean difference, mean tracheal airflow minus mean whole body plethysmography airflow; relative mean difference, mean difference/mean tracheal airflow; CV, coefficient of variation = mean difference/mean tracheal airflow.