Table 1.
Proportion of eye position sensitivity across recordings
| Monkey |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | W | E | M | C | X | Total | |
| Sites tested (unique penetrations) | 202 | 97 | 49 | 42 | 53 | 77 | 520 |
| EP effect (silent period) | 55 (27%) | 33 (34%) | 25 (51%) | 24 (57%) | 13 (25%) | 10 (13%) | 160 (31%) |
| EP effect (stimulus period) | 61 (30%) | 27 (28%) | 14 (29%) | 16 (38%) | 11 (21%) | 13 (17%) | 142 (27%) |
| EP effect (either period)* | 61 (30%) | 36 (37%) | 24 (49%) | 23 (55%) | 15 (28%) | 16 (21%) | 175 (34%) |
Values are the number of tested sites in each monkey and the number of sites in which multiple regressions fit to the data were not flat (i.e., 95% confidence intervals of slopes not including 0). Only uniquely sampled penetrations are included; in cases where a location was sampled more than once, the session showing the clearest auditory response pattern was used. The number of eye position (EP)-sensitive sites is noted for 2 tested epochs: a silent period and a stimulus period (during the presence of a sound). For combined tests across both epochs, a Bonferroni-corrected P value is used to estimate 95% confidence intervals across 2 tests.
Bonferroni-corrected P = 0.0253, corresponding to P < 0.05 across tests.