Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 26;107(3):808–823. doi: 10.1152/jn.00510.2011

Table 3.

Distribution of 5 quantitative measures of discharge behavior for the population of 10 motoneurons driven by excitation alone and excitation in combination with 6 different spatiotemporal patterns of inhibition

Constant Inhibition
Push-Pull Inhibition
Proportional Inhibition
Significance
Excitation Alone Uniform Proximal Uniform Proximal Uniform Proximal Temporal Spatial Interaction
gexr, % 17.98 ± 9.69 25.63 ± 10.53 23.3 ± 9.38 41.83 ± 8.8 34.8 ± 7.28 43.97 ± 22.11 29.86 ± 11.69 P < 0.001 P < 0.05 NS
Nspi 4.5 ± 2.37 6.5 ± 3.87 3.1 ± 2.02 9.7 ± 3.74 1.2 ± 0.42 11.2 ± 7.77 1.9 ± 1.29 NS P < 0.001 P < 0.001
df/dt, imp·s−1·s−1 0.74 ± 0.17 0.79 ± 0.18 0.76 ± 0.2 1.62 ± 0.23 1.8 ± 0.41 0.48 ± 0.39 −0.28 ± 0.13 P < 0.001 P < 0.05 P < 0.001
dfi, imp/s 8.6 ± 4.21 8.52 ± 4.4 6.19 ± 3.77 8.72 ± 3.17 2.16 ± 1.72 5.66 ± 3.81 2.75 ± 4.19 P < 0.01 P < 0.01 NS
dgex, % 18.3 ± 2.86 11.69 ± 4.31 19.2 ± 3.0 3.21 ± 3.0 11.97 ± 7.75 5.39 ± 9.94 16.73 ± 18.4 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 NS

Gexr, percentage of maximum excitatory drive at recruitment; Nspi, the number of spikes in the initial rapid phase of firing rate increase; df/dt, slope of second phase of firing rate increase; dfi, difference in firing rate between the beginning and end of the initial phase of firing rate increase; dgex, percent difference in excitatory drive at recruitment and de-recruitment. Significance values are the results of a 2-way ANOVA of the significance of temporal and spatial patterns of inhibition on each outcome measure along with the interaction of spatial and temporal factors. NS, no significant difference.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure