Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 28;6(2):e1530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001530

Table 2. Fourteen standard species included in the study and its respective Tm and HRM analysis.

Tm analysis HRM analysis
Sp Tm SD 95% CI of Tm VC Tm genotype HRM genotype %C %C SD
Opossum 81.02 0.09 80.97–81.06 0.10 Opossum Opossum 81.24 15.02
Mouse 81.63 0.12 81.57–81.69 0.14 Mouse Mouse 94.19 4.94
Cow 81.76 0.49 81.51–82.00 0.60 Cow Cow 83.07 16.63
Goat 81.88 0.05 81.86–81.91 0.06 Goat Goat 88.24 13.25
Dog 82.29 0.08 82.25–82.33 0.09 Dog Dog 90.92 13.86
Sheep 82.29 0.03 82.26–82.33 0.04 Sheep Sheep 98.69 1.50
Horse 82.56 0.08 82.52–82.60 0.10 Horse Horse 93.46 9.04
Pig 82.58 0.05 82.55–82.60 0.06 Pig Pig 95.18 9.50
Rabbit 82.69 0.05 82.66–82.72 0.06 Rabbit Rabbit 98.55 1.33
Cat 83.46 0.09 83.41–83.50 0.11 Cat Cat 78.81 22.40
Rat 83.55 0.05 83.50–83.59 0.05 Rat Rat 89.90 6.51
Donkey 84.39 0.04 84.36–84.41 0.05 Donkey Donkey 87.85 22.14
Human 85.79 0.05 85.76–85.82 0.06 Human Human 96.58 2.22
Chicken 86.27 0.05 86.24–86.29 0.06 Chicken Chicken 93.05 18.01

SD: standard deviation, CI: confidence interval, VC: variability correlation, %C: confidence percentage, %C SD: standard deviation of confidence percentage, Tm Genotype: Genotype according to Tm from all the replicas.