Table 2. Associations between Parental Substance Abuse, Treatment History and SUD in the Proband1.
| Parental History1 | SUD in Proband | |
|---|---|---|
| MATERNAL HISTORY | % | OR3 [95% CI] p |
| No Maternal Impairment from Substance Problems | 25.6 |
2.19 [1.61-2.98] p<0.001 |
| Maternal Impairment from Substance Problems | 42.9 | |
| Maternal Treatment for Substance Problems2 | 44.4 |
0.83 n/a4 |
| Maternal Treatment for Substance Problems2 | 40.4 | |
| PATERNAL HISTORY | % | OR3 [95% CI] p |
| No Paternal Impairment from Substance Problems | 22.6 |
2.38 [1.91-2.97] p<0.001 |
| Paternal Impairment from Substance Problems | 39.7 | |
| No Paternal Treatment for Substance Problems2 | 43.3 |
0.56 [0.36-0.87] p=0.010 |
| Paternal Treatment for Substance Problems2 | 29.4 | |
| MATERNAL & PATERNAL HISTORY5 | % | OR3 [95% CI] p |
| No Maternal and Paternal Impairment from Substance Problems | 24.8 |
3.17 [1.90-5.30] p<0.000 |
| Maternal and Paternal Impairment for Substance Problems | 51.7 | |
1
Estimates are weighted and based on available data among those raised by their “natural” mothers or fathers.
2
Only probands whose mothers and fathers who were impaired by substance use were asked whether their parents received treatment.
3
All models control for the proband's age, race, gender, and level of education.
4
Standard errors for models testing the association between maternal substance abuse treatment history could not be calculated due to sampling strata with a single sampling unit, thus confidence intervals and test statistics are not available (n/a). Models were also run weighted with scaled certainty units as well as unweighted and were not significant.
5
Estimates are based on those raised by their natural mothers and fathers.