Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 11;28(5):664–671. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts005

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Comparison between experimental ΔΔG (ΔΔGexp) and scaled calculated ΔΔG (sΔΔGcal). The parameters of the fitting line are provided in the graph. (A) For the training database and the correlation coefficient R is 0.28; (B) for the blind test and the corresponding correlation coefficient R is 0.34; (C) for the entire dataset and the correlation coefficient R is 0.3.