Table 2.
Comparison of the different methods (k=6) when the genomic orientation of the motif is unknown
| Performance with implanted k-mers, random strand |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5%Precision |
AUC ROC |
AUC PR |
|||||
| Motif setting: | m1r8 | m4r2 | m1r8 | m4r2 | m1r8 | m4r2 | |
| D2 | 0.88 | 0.59 | 0.72 | 0.54 | 0.72 | 0.54 | |
| D2z | 0.91 | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.56 | 0.73 | 0.56 | |
| D2* | 0.87 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.58 | 0.70 | 0.57 | |
| N2* | 0.86 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.58 | 0.70 | 0.57 | |
| N2rc | 0.93 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.60 | 0.77 | 0.59 | |
Bold numbers indicate best performance.