Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 12;28(5):656–663. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts028

Table 3.

Comparison of the different methods (k=6) when motifs are sampled from all k-mers with one mismatch to the word

Performance with implanted k-mers, mismatch
5 Precision
AUC ROC
AUC PR
Motif setting: m1r8 m4r2 m1r8 m4r2 m1r8 m4r2
D2 0.59 0.51 0.53 0.48 0.53 0.49
D2z 0.59 0.54 0.54 0.51 0.53 0.51
D2* 0.60 0.54 0.54 0.51 0.54 0.51
N2* 0.59 0.54 0.54 0.51 0.54 0.51
N2mm(0.01) 0.60 0.54 0.55 0.51 0.54 0.51
N2mm(1.0) 0.65 0.55 0.57 0.52 0.57 0.53

Bold numbers indicate best performance.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure