Table 3.
Comparison of the different methods (k=6) when motifs are sampled from all k-mers with one mismatch to the word
Performance with implanted k-mers, mismatch |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 Precision |
AUC ROC |
AUC PR |
|||||
Motif setting: | m1r8 | m4r2 | m1r8 | m4r2 | m1r8 | m4r2 | |
D2 | 0.59 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.48 | 0.53 | 0.49 | |
D2z | 0.59 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.51 | |
D2* | 0.60 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.51 | |
N2* | 0.59 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.51 | |
N2mm(0.01) | 0.60 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.51 | |
N2mm(1.0) | 0.65 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.52 | 0.57 | 0.53 |
Bold numbers indicate best performance.