Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 29.
Published in final edited form as: Proc IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit. 2011 Jun 20:1089–1096. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995708

Table 1.

Average distance error (in pixels) for each landmark location compared to the manual annotations. The corresponding locations of the landmarks were obtained using only the registration layer (REG) and both registration and landmark layers in tandem (LM+REG). Columns A and B refer to results from cohorts A and B, respectively.

REG LM+REG

ID A B A B

0 9.49 9.60 5.33 5.84
1 20.73 7.68 16.04 7.00
2 17.29 15.04 13.70 10.98
3 10.92 6.83 9.29 6.18
4 9.44 9.35 6.25 6.48
5 9.19 7.38 9.52 7.63
6 12.17 11.11 9.78 8.62
7 8.80 9.71 5.99 6.34
8 9.42 6.63 8.29 5.34
9 5.48 6.19 5.51 6.19