Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 29.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2009 Aug 28;47(6):835–845. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.08.017

Table 1.

Summary of Echocardiographic Data

Treatment N EDD
(cm)
ESD
(cm)
LVPW (D)
(cm)
LVPW (S)
(cm)
FS (%)
Sham 6 0.31±0.02 0.13±0.01 0.09±0.01 0.16±0.01 64.2±2
Sham +
t-AUCB
6 0.30±0.02 0.14±0.01 0.09±0.01 0.15±0.01 61.1±1
MI alone 11 0.36±0.02 0.25±0.02* 0.12±0.01 0.16±0.01 33.3±3*
MI +
t-AUCB
11 0.34±0.02 0.16±0.02 0.10±0.01 0.15±0.01 52.3±3

EDD, end diastolic dimension; ESD, end systolic dimension; LVPW (D), left ventricular posterior wall thickness in diastole; LVPW (S), left ventricular posterior wall thickness in systole. Data are mean±s.e.m. (one-way ANOVA Games-Howell test,

*

p<0.05 comparing MI alone with sham,

p<0.05 comparing treated vs. untreated MI animals).