Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 29;7(2):e31898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031898

Table 1. The total number of clones from the S. vulgaris short insert library containing respective elements and the proportion of total screened clones in comparison with the S. latifolia [28].

Type of element
Silene vulgaris Silene latifolia *
number of sequences per genome % of genome number of sequences per genome % of genome Ratio %SV/%SL
Retroelements 29540 22.9% 72500 36.4% 0.63
LTR 29064 22.8% 69687 36.1% 0.63
Gypsy 13112 12.7% 55937 32.5% 0.39
Athila 714 0.5% 10000 2.7% 0.18
Ogre 0 0 25000 22.7% 0
Peabody 1904 1.1% 11250 2.8% 0.39
Retand 11190 11.2% 9687 4% 2.8
Copia 15952 10.1% 13750 3.6% 2.81
Non - LTR 476 0.10% 2813 0.3% 0.33
SINE 0 0 0 0 0
LINE 476 0.10% 2813 0.3% 0.33
DNA transposons 1428 0.6% 938 0.2% 3
Tandem repeats 42141 0.3% 42814 0.46% 0.65
Tandem repeat STAR 28095 0.1% 9063 0.02% 5
Tandem repeat X.43.1 4523 0.12% 31563 0.37% 0.32
TR1 9523 0.06% 2188 0.01% 6
All repetitive elements 73109 23.4% 116252 36.8% 0.64

Ratios % SV/% SL below 1.0 indicate elements that are more expanded in S. latifolia genome, and ratios % SV/% SL higher than 1.0 show elements that are more expanded in S. vulgaris.