Table 2.
Content Adherence Principal Components Analysis (varimax rotation) Three Factor Solution | |||
---|---|---|---|
Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | |
Identified goals | −0.06 | 0.01 | 0.64a |
Alcohol use, norms and consequences | −0.01 | 0.13 | 0.82a |
Fighting, norms and consequences | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.80a |
Reasons to Stay Away from Drinking | 0.91a | 0.24 | 0.11 |
Reasons to Stay Away from Fighting | 0.93a | 0.18 | .07 |
Introduced Scenarios | 0.94a | 0.17 | −0.13 |
Key Message of Scenario 1 | 0.93a | 0.19 | −0.03 |
Key Message of Scenario 2 | 0.94a | 0.19 | −0.06 |
Key Message of Scenario 3 | 0.93a | 0.17 | 0.02 |
Key Message of Scenario 4 | 0.79a | 0.31 | −0.09 |
Key Message of Scenario 5 | 0.47 | 0.68 | −0.18 |
Summarized Session | 0.24 | 0.89a | 0.02 |
Identified Appropriate Resources | 0.18 | 0.82a | 0.11 |
Identified one next step | 0.21 | 0.90a | 0.07 |
GROMIT Principal Components Analysis (varimax rotation)Two Factor Solution | ||
---|---|---|
Factor 1 | Factor 2 | |
Provided feedback in objective fashion | 0.30 | 0.78a |
Avoided power struggles | 0.30 | 0.80a |
Understanding of client’s perspective | 0.71a | 0.27 |
Confidence in client’s ability to make changes | 0.77a | 0.16 |
Guided the client toward change talk | 0.69 | 0.44 |
Expressed interest in client’s goals and values | 0.75a | 0.22 |
Did not attempt to persuade client | 0.30 | 0.68a |
Did not argue with client | 0.40 | 0.75a |
Did not assume expert role | 0.16 | 0.85a |
Encouraged client to contribute ideas: alcohol | 0.76a | 0.25 |
Encouraged client to contribute ideas: violence | 0.71 | 0.39 |
Expressed approval of the client | 0.70a | 0.24 |
Directed attention toward client’s strengths | 0.51a | 0.23 |
Seemed genuine | 0.40 | 0.72 |
Recognized and responded to change talk | 0.65a | 0.34 |
Did not steam roll the client | 0.24 | 0.75a |
Marker item for the factor (i.e. loading > 0.50 on the factor and < 0.35 on other factors.
1 ICC= Intra-class Correlation
Note: All items scored on a 7-point Likert type scale