Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug 4;1(1):9–23. doi: 10.1159/000330428

Table 3.

Comparison of the performance of the predictive models after adding the biomarkers

Model Biomarker (p value) AIC H-L test (p value) AUC (95% CI) NRI (p value) IDI (p value)
Clinical model 197.2 0.01 0.79 (0.70–0.89)
Clinical + uNGAL 0.0008 188.7 0.21 0.82 (0.73–0.91) 0.38 (0.04) 0.06 (0.04)
Clinical + pNGAL 0.052 195.5 0.01 0.81 (0.72–0.90)* 0.42 (0.02) 0.02 (0.28)
Clinical + uCyC 0.76 199.1 0.01 0.79 (0.70–0.89) −0.25 (0.17) 0.0004 (0.88)
Clinical + pCyC 0.006 191.3 0.02 0.81 (0.72–0.90) 0.08 (0.67) 0.04 (0.09)

H-L = Hosmer-Lemeshow.

*

p < 0.05 for improvement in AUC vs. clinical model alone.