Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Neurol. 2011 Dec;68(12):1562–1568. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2011.725

Table. Characteristics of the Study Samplea.

PD Groups
Variable HCs
(n=23)
PD-NC
(n=61)
PD-MCI
(n=12)
PDD
(n=11)
Clinical and demographic
 Age, y 71.5 (9.2) 69.3 (5.7) 75.7 (7.7)b 73.1 (7.2)
 Male sex, No. (%) 5 (22) 39 (64)c 10 (83) 7 (64)
 Education, y 15.8 (2.9) 16.0 (2.8) 15.2 (1.6) 14.4 (2.7)
 PD duration, y NA 7.1 (3.8) 9.3 (6.6) 9.0 (7.1)
 Hoehn and Yahr stage, median (IQR) NA 2.0 (2.0-2.5) 2.0 (2.0-3.0) 3.0 (2.5-3.0)d
 Levodopa dosage, mg/de NA 424 (368) 543 (441) 610 (209)
 Dopamine agonist dosage, mg/de NA 101 (164) 75 (145) 45 (101)
 UPDRS motor score NA 20.3 (8.9) 23.6 (11.1) 29.5 (12.7)
 GDS-15 scoref 0.7 (1.4) 2.2 (2.3)g 3.3 (3.1) 4.0 (3.1)
Neuropsychological assessment
 DRS-2
  Total score 141.5 (2.5) 139.4 (3.0)h 127.8 (3.5) 108.5 (17.1)i
  Total standardized score 13.2 (2.1) 11.5 (2.0)j 6.8 (0.9) 3.3 (1.2)k
  Memory subscale NA 23.7 (1.3) 20.5 (2.2) 16.4 (4.7)
  Attention subscale NA 36.2 (1.7) 34.9 (1.9) 33.1 (3.4)l
  Conceptualization subscale NA 37.3 (1.6) 35.3 (2.1) 31.8 (3.6)l,m
  Initiation/perseveration subscale NA 36.2 (1.7) 31.3 (3.9) 22.8 (6.9)n
  Construction subscale NA 5.9 (0.3) 5.9 (0.3) 4.4 (2.2)o
 HVLT-Rp
  Immediate recall NA 21.0 (4.8) 13.4 (4.7) 11.7 (7.0)l,q
  Delayed recall NA 6.6 (3.0) 3.8 (2.5) 1.6 (2.1)l,r
  Recognition discrimination NA 10.0 (1.5) 8.3 (1.8) 6.3 (4.4)l

Abbreviations: DRS-2, Dementia Rating Scale–2; GDS-15,15-Item Geriatric Depression Scale16 (a commonly used version as opposed to the original 30-item GDS); HCs, healthy controls; HVLT-R, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test–Revised; IQR, interquartile range; NA, not applicable; PD, Parkinson disease; PDD, PD with dementia-level cognitive deficits; PD-MCI, PD with mild cognitive impairment; PD-NC, PD with normal cognition; UPDRS, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale.

a

Comparisons are between PD-NC and HC groups and among PD-NC, PD-MCI, and PDD groups. Unless otherwise indicated, data are expressed as mean (SD)

b

P= .01, PD-NC vs PD-MCI group (Tukey test).

c

P= .001, PD-NCvs HC group (χ12=11.9).

d

P= .001, PDDvs PD-NC group (Tukey test)

e

Includes 83 PD patients.

f

Includes 102 PD patients and HCs.

g

P= .001, HCvs PD-NC group (t67.1 = −3.6)

h

P= .005, PD-NC vs HC group (t82 = 2.9).

i

P< .001 among all PD groups (F2,81 = 105.6)

j

P= .001, PD-NC vs HC group (t82 = 3.3).

k

P< .001 among all PD groups (F2,81 = 114.9)

l

P< .001, PDD vs PD-NC group (Tukey test).

m

P = .03, PDDvs PD-MCI group (Tukeytest)

n

P< .001 among all PD groups (F2,81 = 88.0).

o

P< .001, PDD vs PD-MCI group and PDD vs PD-NC group (Tukey test)

p

Includes 60 PD patients.

q

P= .001, PD-NCvs PD-MCI group (Tukey test)

r

P= .03, PD-NC vs PD-MCI group (Tukey test).