Table 4.
2,4-D (n = 88) | R-Squared = Regression | 0.36 |
---|---|---|
Variable 1 | Coefficient | P-value |
Intercept α0 | 27 | 0.76 |
Mix α1, | 58 | 0.53 |
Method α2 | 123 | 0.02 |
Repair α3 | 32 | 0.59 |
Gloves β1 | 0.75 | <0.001 |
PPE other β2 | 0.26 | 0.26 |
Chlorpyrifos (n = 17) | R-Squared = Regression | 0.77 |
Variable1 | Coefficient | P-value |
Intercept α0 | 8 | 0.22 |
Mix α1, | Na 2 | Na 2 |
Method α2 | 33 | 0.006 |
Repair α3 | 15 | 0.89 |
Gloves β1 | 0.51 | 0.014 |
PPE other β2 | 0.21 | 0.59 |
1 α0 represented the urinary concentration at the referent level of all factors, where α1, α2 and α3 parameters represented the increase in Y for mixing (1 = yes, 0 = no), use of hand spray (method = 1) or boom spray (method = 0) for 2,4-D, or boom spray (method = 1) or in-furrow (method = 0) for chlorpyrifos, and repairing equipment (1 = yes, 0 = no), respectively, and where β1 and β2 parameters represented the reduction factors for use of CR gloves (1 = yes, 0 = no) and/or other PPE (1 = yes, 0 = no), respectively.
2 na: all participants mixed chlorpyrifos and the regression omitted the variable.