Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 1;8(3):e1002402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002402

Figure 3. Schematics of how feedback from PIs change small GTPase profiles.

Figure 3

Shown are the Rac distributions in the 2D cell [(a) and Video S1] and in a representative 1D cross-section along the cell diameter (b,c). Left panels: absent PI feedback (Inline graphic). Right panels: with PI feedback (Inline graphic). The sharp transition between high and low Rac activity is seen on the left (contours closely spaced), whereas PIs create a broader transition zone (right). Panels (b–c): schematics of differences in intracellular patterns due to maximal PI feedback to Rho proteins. (b): Inactive Rac (dot-dashed line) is nearly uniform for Inline graphic, but shows significant depletion close to the “front” for high Inline graphic. Decreasing the rate of diffusion Inline graphic of inactive Rac (red curves) has little effect on the profile when Inline graphic. In contrast, decreasing Inline graphic when Inline graphic leads to a lower peak of active Rac at the front. Panels (c): Communication of multiple peaks of active Rac is very slow in the Inline graphic case, and much more significant in the case Inline graphic. Hence, feedback from PIs helps to resolve conflicting cell “fronts”.