Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 1;8(3):e1002401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002401

Figure 3. The effect of the size of the scaling factor .

Figure 3

Inline graphic and the number of particles Inline graphic on the variance of the estimates. Large minimal values of Inline graphic and small values of Inline graphic imply large variance of the estimates. (A) Resampling of particles (see Methods) implies adaptation of (among others) the scaling factors Inline graphic, which gradually approach the lower bound of their prior interval (red lines in Ai,ii). A prior interval with zero lower bound (i.e. Inline graphic) leads to estimates with negligible variance (Ai). A prior interval with relatively large lower bound (e.g. Inline graphic) leads to estimates with non-zero variance (Aii). Notice that the expectation Inline graphic in Ai does not actually take the value Inline graphic (instead it becomes approximately equal to Inline graphic). (B) A small number of particles (Bi, Inline graphic) implies estimates with large variance (compare to Bii, Inline graphic). Notice that the difference between Aii (Inline graphic) and Bii (Inline graphic) is negligible, implying the presence of a ceiling effect, when the number of particles becomes very large. In these simulations, Inline graphic and Inline graphic.