Table 1. Results of epidemic appraisals for six countries using the numerical proxy classification and Modes of Transmission (MOT) analysis.

Country	Uganda	Kenya	Nigeria	Peru	Thailand	India
Numerical proxy classification	Generalized	Generalized	Generalized	Concentrated	Generalized	Concentrated
HIV prevalence in general population (year) [3]	6.5 (2009)	6.3 (2009)	3.6 (2009)	0.4 (2009)	1.3 (2009)	0.3 (2009)
HIV prevalence within a key population (year)	FSW(47.2;2003)	FSW(31.0;2005)HR-MSM(38.0;2005)IDU(35.0;2004)	FSW(32.7;2007)HR-MSM(13.5;2007)IDU(5.6; 2007)	FSW(0.5;2008)HR-MSM(10.8;2008)	FSW(2.8;2009)HR-MSM(13.5;2009)IDU(38.7;2009)	FSW(4.7;2008)HR-MSM(7.3;2008)IDU(9.2;2008)
MOT analysis : year	2008	2008	2009	2010	2005	2010
Distribution of incident infections (% of total), by subgroup
Low-risk heterosexual	42.9	12.3	42.3	16.0	43.4	62.9
Medical injection	0.06	2.2	1.2	0.23	0.8	0.3
Blood transfusion	0.00	0.3	0.5	0.0	0.0	0.0
IDU	0.28	3.8	9.0	1.9	5.7	14.1
Partners of IDU	0.01	0.6	0.4	0.22	1.0	0.55
Female sex workers	0.91	6.6	3.4	0.89	3.9	2.2
Clients	7.8	7.5	4.8	1.3	6.1	7.0
Partners of clients	1.8	1.6	3.4	6.4	8.4	3.0
HR-MSM	0.6	15.2	10.3	54.9	20.9	6.2
Female partners of HR-MSM	0.1	1.3	0.9	6.2	2.5	0.26
Multiple partners (MP)	23.7	20.3	9.1	6.3	3.4	1.2
Partners of MP	21.8	28.3	14.8	5.5	3.9	2.2

HR-MSM (high-risk men who have sex with men); IDU (injecting drug user); FSW (female sex worker). Results were obtained from published sources for the following countries: Uganda (Uganda MOT and Country Report) [17], [21], Kenya (Kenya MOT and Country Report) [5], [22], Nigeria (Nigeria Country Report) [24], Peru (Peru MOT) [25], Thailand [13]. National HIV prevalence estimates for key populations in India were obtained from country level reports [48], [49].