Table 2.
European public assessment reports comparison—filgrastim
Zarzio/filgrastim hexal | Biograstim/filgrastim ratiopharm/ratiograstim/tevagrastim (XM02) | Nivestim | |
---|---|---|---|
Product characteristics | |||
Produced | E. Coli | E. Coli | E. Coli |
Strength | Two strengths: 30 MU/0.5 ml and 48 MU/0.5 ml. | Two strengths: 30 or 48 MIU (corresponding to 300 and 480 μg respectively). | Three strengths: 120 μg/0.2 ml, 300 μg/0.5 ml and 480 μg/0.5 ml. |
Medicinal product | Product composition of Zarzio and Neupogen® are quantitatively identical except the buffer system, glutamate for Zarzio and acetate for Neupogen® | Buffered with acetate. Differs from Neupogen® only in pH and in the concentration of filgrastim and polysorbate 80. | Buffered with acetate. |
Pre-clinical data | |||
Studies | 6 primary PD studies (4 in vitro); 3 toxicology studies (comparative repeat-dose toxicity, toxicokinetics, local tolerance; no single-dose toxicity study); no secondary PD studies; no safety pharmacology studies; no PK studies | 6 primary PD studies (3 in vitro); 1 secondary PD study (in vitro); 3 safety pharmacology studies; 2 PK studies; 6 toxicology studies (repeat dose toxicity study non-comparative) | Primary PD studies: PD response was determined in a neutropenic rat model, as well as in healthy rat in a repeat-dose toxicity study; no secondary PD studies; no safety pharmacology studies; PK assessed as part of the repeat-dose toxicity study; no single-dose toxicity study |
Clinical data | |||
Phase I (PK/PD) studies | 4 PK/PD studies in healthy volunteers | 2 PK/PD studies in healthy volunteers | 2 PK/PD studies in healthy voluteers |
Phase III studies | 1 non-controlled study in patients with breast cancer | 3 RCTS (patients with breast cancer, lung cancer, NHL) | 1 RCT in patients with breast cancer |
Efficacy data | Similar to Neupogen® The comparability of the efficacy based on a PPD study in healthy volunteers (absolute neutrophile and CS34+ cell counts) was considered acceptable by the CHMP. | Similar to Neupogen® There were no statistically significant differences between XM02 and Neupogen® with regard to the mean ANC nadir and with regard to time to ANC recovery in the studies. | Similar to Neupogen® There was therapeutic equivalence between the two products in terms of efficacy with regard to the mean ANC nadir and with regard to time to ANC recovery. |
Safety data | Similar to Neupogen® | Similar to Neupogen® | Similar to Neupogen® |