. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 2.

Published in final edited form as: J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009 Jun 21;37(4):335–345. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2009.03.012

Table 5.

Indices of patients’ perceptions of treatment as predictors of proximal outcomes at discharge

Variables	Proximal outcomes
Variables	Benefits of quitting	Self efficacy	Substance-specific coping	Approach coping	Avoidance coping
Covariate r²	.16 ^**	.16 ^**	.11 ^**	.08 ^**	.11 ^**
Patient status (0 = SUD, 1 = DD)	−.09 ^**	−.10 ^**	−.04	−.07 ^**	.05^*
Perceptions of Treatment
Support	.12 ^**	.14 ^**	.17 ^**	.18 ^**	−.07 ^**
Clarity	.10 ^**	.13 ^**	.13 ^**	.12 ^**	−.09 ^**
Spirituality	.10 ^**	.13 ^**	.19 ^**	.16 ^**	−.05^*
Satisfaction	.24 ^**	.22 ^**	.23 ^**	.26 ^**	−.09 ^**
Final r²	.22 ^**	.22 ^**	.18 ^**	.16 ^**	.13 ^**

Note. In each regression, control variables (race/ethnicity, education, and employment, intake value of the dependent variable, and program treatment orientation) were entered in Step 1; patient status and perceptions of treatment were entered in Step 2. Entries in the table are standardized beta coefficients; entries in bold identify independent predictors. Sample sizes for regressions ranged from 2,289 to 2,311 due to missing data.

p < .05.

^**

p < .01.