Table 1.
Experiment | Simulated | ||
---|---|---|---|
mean sd | Channeling | Mixed | |
Glucose | χ2 = 0.442 | 0.406 | |
m0 | 0.512 ± 0.0069 | 0.511 | 0.511 |
m1 | 0.00913 ± 0.002 | 0.0084 | 0.00839 |
m2 | 0.478 ± 0.00652 | 0.481 | 0.481 |
[mM] | 19.7 ± 1.92 | 20.4 | 20.2 |
Lactate | χ2 = 1.43 | 7.32 | |
m0 | 0.86 ± 0.0482 | 0.839 | 0.81 |
m1 | 0.0235 ± 0.00802 | 0.0237 | 0.0178 |
m2 | 0.0946 ± 0.0388 | 0.133 | 0.17 |
m3 | 0.022 ± 0.0438 | 0.00381 | 0.00145 |
[mM] | 0.81 ± 0.51 | 0.959 | 1.48 |
Glutamate C2-C5 | χ2 = 0.0564 | 0.0424 | |
m0 | 0.912 ± 0.0343 | 0.912 | 0.912 |
m1 | 0.0299 ± 0.0116 | 0.0301 | 0.0298 |
m2 | 0.0523 ± 0.0217 | 0.0574 | 0.0567 |
Glutamate C2-C4 | χ2 = 0.0049 | 0.00437 | |
m0 | 0.919 ± 0.0339 | 0.919 | 0.919 |
m1 | 0.0365 ± 0.00175 | 0.0356 | 0.355 |
m2 | 0.0446 ± 0.0166 | 0.0454 | 0.0451 |
Glycogen | χ2 = 1.2 | 30.5 | |
m0 | 0.608 ± 0.0388 | 0.598 | 0.658 |
m1 | 0.0162 ± 0.0033 | 0.0151 | 0.0271 |
m2 | 0.362 ± 0.0351 | 0.375 | 0.299 |
m3 | 0.00399 ± 0.0011 | 0.00422 | 0.00791 |
m4 | 0.00961 ± 0.0026 | 0.00748 | 0.00749 |
m5 | 0.000464 ± 0.00016 | 0.000432 | 0.000533 |
mg/mL | 0.355 ± 0.112 | 0.313 | 0.232 |
Σ1 χ2 | 3.13 | 38.28 | |
Glycogen C1-C4 | χ2 = 1.42 | 6.68 | |
m0 | 0.613 ± 0.0448 | 0.627 | 0.679 |
m1 | 0.0224 ± 0.00834 | 0.0133 | 0.0297 |
m2 | 0.357 ± 0.0425 | 0.358 | 0.289 |
Glycogen C3-C6 | χ2 = 7.97 | 30 | |
m0 | 0.952 ± 0.00767 | 0.952 | 0.951 |
m1 | 0.00743 ± 0.00211 | 0.0131 | 0.018 |
m2 | 0.0371 ± 0.00467 | 0.0333 | 0.0279 |
Σ2χ2 | 9.21 | 36.68 | |
Σtχ2 = Σ1χ2+Σ2χ2 | 12.52 | 74.95 |
Isotopologues (m0, non-labeled; m1, containing one 13C isotope; m2, two 13C isotopes, etc) produced by isolated hepatocytes from glucose as the only substrate contained 50% of [1,2-13C2]D-glucose were measured in glucose from medium, glucose from glycogen and its fragments, lactate, and fragments of glutamate after two hours of incubation. The measurements are presented as mean ± standard deviation. The data were simulated using two models that either accounted for channeling or suggested a single "mixed" pool of hexose phosphates in accordance with the schemes presented in Figure 1. The fitting was performed using a stochastic algorithm described in Methods. The difference between the best fit and experimental data (χ2, see Methods) are shown for each metabolite and summarized for the whole set of data.