Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hippocampus. 2011 Aug 18;22(6):1363–1370. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20972

TABLE 1. Stabilized Baseline Electrophysiological Responses Were Comparable Across Conditions.

n Medial fEPSP (mV/ms) Medial PS (mV) Lateral fEPSP (mV/ms)
Strain
 Long-Evans 5 5.88 ± 0.68 1.91 ± 0.37 1.44 ± 0.06
 Sprague-Dawley 5 7.30 ± 0.65 2.27 ± 0.52 1.47 ± 0.01
 Group difference P = 0.17 P = 0.58 P = 0.89
Circadian (LE rats)
 Dark cycle 5 5.65 ± 0.57 3.34 ± 0.61 1.65 ± 0.28
 Light cycle 5 5.88 ± 0.68 1.91 ± 0.37 1.44 ± 0.06
 Group difference P = 0.8 P = 0.08 P = 0.48
Stimulation protocol (LE rats)
 50T 5 5.65 ± 0.57 3.34 ± 0.61 1.65 ± 0.28
 8TBS 7 5.89 ± 0.50 2.01 ± 0.21 1.72 ± 0.09
 8Hyb 6 4.41 ± 0.98 2.23 ± 0.57 1.28 ± 0.09
 Group difference P = 0.35 P = 0.32 P = 0.22

Values were averaged across the last 4 days of baseline stabilization prior to HFS. Data are mean ± S.E.M. and all group differences were nonsignificant by one-way ANOVA.