Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 12;9:5. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-9-5

Table 3.

Ranking of findings by strength of evidence across platforms

NanoString TLDA qPCR
miRNA p FC p FC p FC
miR-31 0.0059 -3.9 0.0026 -10.3 0.0040 -9.2
miR-125b 0.0419 -2.5 0.0066 -4.5 0.0090 -3.6
miR-150 0.0071 -1.9 0.0261 -1.6 0.0003 -1.6
miR-31* NA 0.0043 -10.1 0.0195 -8.5
miR-9 0.0033 1.8 0.0489 4.1 NA
miR-181b 0.0092 1.8 NA 0.0400 1.6
miR-29a < 0.1 0.0117 -1.5 0.0180 -1.7
let-7g 0.0004 -1.7 0.0028 -1.5 NS
miR-16 NS 0.0061 1.5 0.0001 1.5
miR-146b-5p 0.0025 -2.6 0.0020 -2.7 NS
miR-155 0.0071 1.5 NS 0.0690 1.3
miR-34a < 0.1 0.0514 3.6 0.0040 3.1

For NanoString, TaqMan low-density array (TLDA), and quantitative PCR (qPCR), miRNAs are presented according to the estimated strength of evidence for differential regulation between viremic patients and controls: bold (p < 0.05 for each method with which the respective miRNA was measured); italics (p < 0.05 for two of three); and regular font (p < 0.05 for one platform and p < 0.1 for at least one other). Each of the listed miRNAs had relatively high levels of expression across samples: more than two standard deviations above background (NanoString) and/or amplifying before a threshold cycle of 30 by TaqMan assay. Abbreviations: p = p value; FC = mean fold difference from control (positive or negative as indicated); NS (not significant) refers here to p > 0.1; NA: not measured with the indicated method. miR-150 values for NanoString and TLDA are rendered in bold italics to indicate quantile normalization limitations at expression extremes (miR-150 is one of the most abundant miRNAs in PBMC).