Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Oral Sci. 2011 Dec;119(Suppl 1):65–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2011.00883.x

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Enamel crystallites in the WT mice (A and B) were well-developed and often showed a parallel organization with respect to adjacent crystallites. In contrast the AKO enamel crystallites (C) were smaller and less organized than the WT crystallites. The KOM180-87 mouse (D) showed a return to normal crystallite development in both size and with an often parallel orientation similar to that seen in the WT enamel. (TEMs all exposed at 270K magnification) (scale bar = 50 nm).