Table 4.
N† | Mean intention score | SD | t | p | |
Heard of glaucoma | |||||
Yes | 280 | 6.33 | 0.91 | 2.04 | 0.047** |
No | 44 | 5.87 | 1.43 | ||
Gender | |||||
Male | 143 | 6.28 | 0.88 | 0.17 | 0.868 |
Female | 177 | 6.30 | 1.05 | ||
Ethnicity | |||||
All black ethnicities | 33 | 5.80 | 1.51 | 2.05 | 0.048** |
All other ethnicities | 281 | 6.35 | 0.87 | ||
Diabetes | |||||
Yes | 37 | 6.41 | 0.98 | 0.71 | 0.476 |
No | 278 | 6.29 | 0.96 | ||
Last eye test | |||||
Within the last 3 years | 265 | 6.29 | 1.00 | 0.17 | 0.867 |
More than 3 years ago/never | 56 | 6.31 | 0.86 | ||
Short-sighted | |||||
Yes | 144 | 6.30 | 0.91 | 0.84 | 0.402‡ |
No | 107 | 6.19 | 1.14 | ||
Don't know | 61 | 6.44 | 0.82 | ||
Family history of glaucoma | |||||
Yes | 53 | 6.43 | 0.69 | 1.11 | 0.269‡ |
No | 172 | 6.27 | 1.00 | ||
Don't know | 94 | 6.30 | 0.99 |
Numbers for each variable do not add up to 327 as some participants did not provide the information.
The test was between ‘yes’ and ‘no’ with those answering ‘don't know’ left out. When the t tests were repeated with the variables coded dichotomously (yes vs ‘not yes’), the t tests remained non-significant.
**p<0.05.