Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 29;12:636. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-636

Table 3.

Performance comparison between TAPIR, Target-align and p-TAREF for Target-align/TAPIR Reference dataset for benchmarking.

TAPIR Target-align p-TAREF
Fasta RNAhybrid Less stringent More stringent Polynomial kernel
TP Rate % 91.83 93.14 97.05 93.14 100
FP Rate % 81.47 88.97 84 57.8 56.2

*TP = True Positive;FP = False Positive

The same benchmarking dataset and procedure was used for p-TAREF as had been used previously by the two tools. P-TAREF was found performing better.