Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 29;470(4):1213–1220. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2190-6

Table 3.

Comparison of local control of various treatment studies

Study Number of patients Methods of surgical treatment Adjuvant procedures Local recurrence rate (%) Mean followup (months)
Kattapuran et al. [23] 7 Intralesional surgery (curettage in two patients and excision-curettage in five) None 43 36
Sanjay et al. [34] 17 Intralesional surgery in 15 patients (curettage in six and excision-curettage in nine); wide resection in two patients Phenol; radiation 17.6 (20% for intralesional surgery; 0% for wide resection) 226
Osaka & Toriyama [30] 5 Intralesional surgery in one patient; wide resection in four patients None 0 163
Donati et al. [14] 10 Intralesional surgery in five patients; wide resection in five patients Drill burring; phenol; ethanol; radiation; bone cement 20 (40% for intralesional surgery; 0% for wide resection) 102
Balke et al. [5] 19 Intralesional surgery in 16 patients (curettage in nine and excision-curettage in seven); wide resection in three patients Drill burring; cryosurgery; radiation; bone cement; arterial embolization 5.3 (6.3% for intralesional surgery; 0% for wide resection) 49
Leggon et al. [25] 6 Intralesional margins in two patients (curettage in two); wide margins in four patients Radiation 16.7 (20% for intralesional margins; 0% for wide margins) 102
Current study 27 Intralesional surgery in 13 patients (curettage in eight and excision-curettage in five); wide resection in 14 patients Drill burring 14.8 (30.8% for intralesional surgery; 0% for wide resection) 50