Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug 2;36(1):16–26. doi: 10.1007/s11031-011-9238-5

Table 1.

Coordinates of face selective voxels in the amygdala from fMRI studies that compared activation to faces with activation to other categories

Study Control category Sample size R. amygdala L. amygdala
N x y z x y z
Fitzgerald et al. (2006) Portable radios 20 −24 −3 −20
Ganel et al. (2005) Scrambled faces 11 18 −7 −9
Hariri et al. (2002) Emotional scenes 12 16 −5 −13
Kesler-West et al. (2001) Scrambled faces 21 17 −7 −8 −17 −9 −8
Maurer et al. (2007) Houses and common household objects 12 20 −9 −20
Pourtois et al. (2005) Houses 14 −21 −15 −9
Goossens et al. (2009) Houses 20 22 −3 −12 −18 −3 −16
Said et al. (2010) Chairs 37 17 −5 −10 −17 −2 −10
Wright and Liu (2006) Pixilated patterns 12 22 −7 −10 −9 −3 −10
Zhang et al. (2008) Chinese characters, common objects, and scrambled images 16 18 −1 −18

The coordinates are reported in Talairach space. Four of the studies (Kesler-West et al. 2001; Maurer et al. 2007; Pourtois et al. 2005; Zhang et al. 2008) are from the sample of studies in Berman et al. (2010). Two of the studies (Fitzgerald et al. 2006; Wright and Liu 2006) compared emotional and neutral faces with a control category. To extract face selective voxels in the amygdala, they performed a conjunction analysis of the individual face contrasts with the control category