Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 6.
Published in final edited form as: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jan;194(1):93–102. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2833

TABLE 1. Predictors of Image Quality: Patient Analysis.

Image Quality
Predictors Optimal (n = 128) Adequate (n = 134) Poor (n = 29) Odds Ratio p

Age (y) 0.98 0 .10
 Mean 59.4 5 9.1 59.8
 SD 10.0 9.7 12.2
Sex (%) (no. / total no. in image quality category)
 Male (n = 214) 78 (100/128) 72 (96/134) 62 (18/29) 1.00 Reference
 Female (n = 77) 22 (28/128) 28 (38/134) 38 (11/29) 1.49 0.49
Ethnicity (%) (no. / total no. in image quality
category)
 White (n = 196) 58 (74/128) 75 (100/134) 76 (22/29) 1.00 Reference
 Asian (n = 66) 35 (45/128) 14 (19/134) 7 (2/29) 2.67 0.06
 Black (n = 18) 3 (4/128) 7 (9/134) 17 (5/29) 0.58 0.04
 Other (n = 11) 4 (5/128) 4 (6/134) 0 (0/29) 2.83 0 .19
Body mass index (kg/m2)
 Mean 26.2 28.3 29.8 0.89 < 0.001
 SD 4 .1 4.3 4.6
CAC score (Agatston units)
 Mean 143.4 140.4 128.6 1.00 0.77
 SD 159.6 15 9.1 15 6.1
Heart rate (bpm)
 Mean 55.8 59.8 66.5 0.90 < 0.001
 SD 10.7 12 .1 7. 8
Heart rate variability (beats per scan) 1.00 0.75
 Mean 4.8 6.3 10.8
 SD 16 .1 12.7 1 7.7
Breath artifact present (no.)a 0 15 7 4.97 < 0.001
Ectopy present (no.)a 2 7 3 2.69 0 .16

Note—CAC = coronary artery calcifcation, bpm = beats per minute.

a

These results are also on the per-patient level; for example, in two patients with optimal image quality at least one ectopic beat was present.