Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar;19(3):401–410. doi: 10.1128/CVI.05544-11

Table 8.

Comparison of detection results for 147 community donors from one community, assayed by IFN-γ ELISPOT assay, T-SPOT.TB assay, and TSTc

Assay and result No. (%) of samples with TST resulta
SFP value (SFC/106 PBMCs or viable cells)b
Positive (≥5 mm) Negative (0 mm) Total P25 P50 P75
IFN-γ ELISPOT assay (total of E6+E7 and E6+E7+C14 assays)
    Positive 35 (23.81) 9 (6.12) 44 (29.93) 169 482 760
    Negative 87 (59.18) 16 (10.88) 103 (70.07) 0 0 0
    Total 122 (82.99) 25 (17.01) 147 0 0 14
T-SPOT.TB assay (total of panel A and panel B)
    Positive 15 (10.20) 6 (4.08) 21 (14.29) 473 152 44
    Negative 107 (72.79) 19 (12.93) 126 (85.71) 1 3 0
    Total 122 (82.99) 25 (17.01) 147 0 1 5
a

No individual was found with a TST induration of 1 to 4 mm.

b

P25, lower quartile SFP value; P50, median SFP value; P75, upper quartile SFP value.

c

For the T-SPOT.TB assay, a positive detection rate of 14.29% and a median positive SFP value of 152 were found, which were significantly lower than the 29.93% positive detection rate and median positive SFP value of 482 for the combined IFN-γ ELISPOT assay for the same 147 cases (P < 0.05); on the other hand, these positive detection rates were significantly lower than the rate of 82.99% for positive TST results (P < 0.05). Some level of positive detection was achieved by the two IFN-γ ELISPOT assays for both the positive and negative TST detection groups.