Skip to main content
. 2006 Sep;12(9):1406–1413. doi: 10.3201/eid1209.041263

Table 3. Frequency of occurrence of MIRU-ETR alleles and allelic diversity at each locus for all strains*.

Locus No. repeats
HGDI No. AV
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
MIRU 2 0 11 172 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.151 4
MIRU 4 0 2 182 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.053 3
MIRU 10 0 2 3 166 15 3 1 5 1 1 0.206 9
MIRU 16 0 24 7 156 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.288 3
MIRU 20 0 1 186 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.011 3
MIRU 23 0 2 0 0 0 173 9 3 0 0 0.142 4
MIRU 24 0 187 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
MIRU 26 0 7 0 2 11 122 5 40 0 0 0.526 6
MIRU 27 1 0 2 184 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.032 3
MIRU 31 0 1 20 31 7 124 4 0 0 0 0.522 6
MIRU 39 0 0 52 135 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.404 2
MIRU 40 2 3 7 147 14 13 1 0 0 0 0.372 7
ETR-A 0 3 18 28 138 0 0 0 0 0 0.426 4
ETR-B 0 0 187 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
ETR-C 0 11 9 157 10 0 0 0 0 0 0.288 4

*N = 187; MIRU, mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units; ETR, exact tandem repeats; HGDI, Hunter-Gaston diversity index; AV, allelic variants.
†Boldface loci showed at least moderate discriminative power as defined by Sola et al. (23) and were the most promising loci. Other loci provided poor discrimination or were monomorphic.