Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar;56(3):1458–1465. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05580-11

Table 1.

FDLA derivatives of the acid hydrolysates of battacin, DNP-battacin, and DNP-deacyl battacin using liquid chromatography-MSa

Sample Retention time (min)
m/z ([M + H]+) FDLA derivative
l-FDLA d-FDLA
Battacin 32.8 35.3 707 α,γ-Bis-FDLA-l-Dab
35.2 32.8 707 α,γ-Bis-FDLA-d-Dab
24.2 32.1 426 FDLA-l-Leu
30.4 24.6 460 FDLA-d-Phe
DNP-battacin 33.2 35.9 707 α,γ-Bis-FDLA-l-Dab
28.7 30.9 579 α-FDLA-γ-DNP-l-Dab
31.0 28.9 579 α-FDLA-γ-DNP-d-Dab
24.6 32.5 426 FDLA-l-Leu
30.9 25.0 460 FDLA-d-Phe
DNP-deacyl battacin 33.1 35.6 707 α,γ-Bis-FDLA-l-Dab
28.4 30.7 579 α-FDLA-γ-DNP-l-Dab
24.4 32.3 426 FDLA-l-Leu
30.6 24.8 460 FDLA-d-Phe
a

Analysis was performed with a Zorbax SB-C18 column. The solvent was a gradient of acetonitrile (solvent A) and 20 mM ammonium acetate adjusted to pH 4.3 with formic acid (solvent B), with a linear increase from 10% solvent A to 20% solvent A within 5 min, followed by a linear increase to 50% solvent A in 45 min. The flow rate was 0.2 ml min−1, and the wavelength was 340 nm.