Table 8.
Concordance of PCR-RFLP and real-time PCR-HRM methods for M. leprae SNP typing of clinical isolates
Sample | Sample type | PCR-RFLPa |
SNP type | HRM clusterb |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Locus 2/CviKI | Locus 3/BstUI | Locus 1 | Locus 2 | Locus 3 | |||
NP101 | Clinical | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
NP103 | Clinical | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
NP108 | Clinical | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
NP109 | Clinical | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
NP110 | Clinical | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
NP111 | Clinical | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
NP112 | Clinical | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
NP114 | Clinical | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
NP116 | Clinical | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
NP117 | Clinical | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
NP118 | Clinical | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
NP119 | Clinical | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
NP120 | Clinical | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
NP123 | Clinical | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
NP106 | Clinical | — | — | 1 | Vc/1 | 2 | 2 |
NP113 | Clinical | — | — | 1 | Vc/1 | 2 | 2 |
NP102 | Clinical | + | — | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
NP104 | Clinical | + | — | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
NP115 | Clinical | + | — | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
NP122 | Clinical | + | — | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
NP124 | Clinical | + | — | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
NP105 | Clinical | + | — | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
NP121 | Clinical | + | — | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
NP125 | Clinical | NDd | — | 2 | 1 | Vc/1 | 2 |
NP107 | Clinical | ND | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
NHDP63 | ADML | + | + | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Thai53 | ADML | — | + | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
BR4923 | ADML | + | + | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
The PCR-RFLP assay was performed as previously described (31).
The NHDP63 allele is assigned to cluster 1 and the alternative allele to cluster 2.
V, HRM automatically grouped the three strains NP106, NP113, and 125 into a different cluster (variant). When the melting curves were manually examined, NP113 and NP125 were in the same cluster as NHDP63, while NP106 appeared to belong to a different cluster. Locus 1 amplicons of NP106 was sequenced, and SNP allele C was same as that of the NHDP63 and TN strains.
ND, not determined due to small amount of amplicon.