Skip to main content
. 2004 Feb;3(1):221–231. doi: 10.1128/EC.3.1.221-231.2004

TABLE 3.

Known and potential targets of Rgt1a

ORF Gene name Protein function or characteristic Ratio of spot intensity of the mutant to that of the wild typeb
No. of Rgt1 sites/ no. of conserved sitesc
rgt1Δ Gal RGT2-1 Gal SNF3-1 Gal snf3Δ rgt2Δ Glu
YHR092C HXT4 Glucose transporter ↑23.1 (↑10.5) ↑2.4 ↑10.6 ↓0.2 5/2
YDR345C HXT3 Glucose transporter ↑13.3 (↑16.9) ↑2.8 ↑5.3 ↓0.2 11/7
YMR011W HXT2 Glucose transporter ↑13.0 (NC) ↑1.9 ↑5.2 ↓0.3 3/2
YKR075C Similarity to N terminus of Reg1 ↑12.6 (↑2.1) ↑2.0 ↑8.1 ↓0.2 7/5
YGL157W Similarity to dihydroflavonol 4-reductase ↑7.9 (↑6.6) ↑2.5 ↑4.6 ↓0.1 2/1
YHR094C HXT1 Glucose transporter ↑7.2 (↑51.4) ↑2.4 ↑3.8 ↓0.1 11/4
YOR047C STD1 Regulator of Rgt1 ↑4.5 (↑3.5) NC ↑2.7 ↓0.4 2/2
YHR096C HXT5 Glucose transporter ↑4.0 (NC) NC ↑2.1 ↓0.3 4/0
YGL209W MIG2 Glucose-dependent repressor ↑3.4 (↑12.5) ↑2.0 ↑6.8 NC 9/4
YNL234W Heme-binding globin-like protein ↑3.1 (NC) NC ↑1.8 ↓0.5 2/1
YOR062C Similarity to N terminus of Reg1 ↑3.0 (↑5) NC ↑1.7 ↓0.2 4/1
YNL065W AQR1 MFSg transporter; resistance to monocarboxylic acids ↑2.6 (NC) NC ↑1.7 NC 5/4
YLR109W AHP1 Alkyl hydroperoxide reductase; redox homeostasis ↑2.5 (NC) NC ↑1.7 ↓0.1 2/2
YER037W PHM8 Involved in phosphate metabolism? ↑2.4 (NC) ↑2.2 ↑2.3 ↓0.2 1/1
YOR338W Uncharacterized ORF (SGD) ↑2.2 (NC) NC NC NC 0
YKL036C Dubious ORF (SGD) ↑2.1 (A) NC NC NC 2
YCR005C CIT2 Peroxisomal citrate synthase ↑2.1 (↑4) ↑1.7 NC ↓0.5 3/2d
YER028C MIG3 Possible glucose-dependent repressor ↑2.0 (↑4.6) NC NC NC 4/2
YGL039W Similarity to dihydroflavonol 4-reductase ↑2.0 (NC) NC NC ↓0.5 2/0
YKL035W UGP1 UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase ↑2.0 (NC) NC NC NC 1/0
YOL016C CMK2 Calmodulin-dependent protein kinase ↑2.0 (↑3.4) ↑1.7 NC NC 1/0
YHR087W Uncharacterized ORF (SGD) ↑2.0 (NC) NC NC ↓0.2 1/0
YMR316W DIA1 Regulation of invasive growth? ↑1.9 (NC) ↑1.7 NC NC 3/0
YER062C HOR2 Glycerol-1-phosphatase ↑1.9 (NC) NC NC ↓0.3 2/1
YJL214W HXT8 Glucose transporter ↑1.9 (↑1.8) NC ↑2.9 NC 5/0
YBR105C VID24 Vacuolar protein targeting ↑1.9 (↑2.6) NC NC NC 4/3
YDR423C CAD1 Jun family of transcription factors ↑1.9 (NC) NC NC NC 0
YHR097C Uncharacterized ORF (SGD) ↑1.9 (NC) NC NC ↓0.5 0
YOL046C Dubious ORF (SGD) ↑1.9 (A) NC NC NC 2
YBR067C TIP1 Cell wall mannoprotein ↑1.9 (NC) NC NC ↑3.8 5/1
YDR277C MTH1 Regulator of Rgt1 ↑1.8 (↑2.1) NC ↑2.0 NC 4/2
YOL136C PFK2 6-Phosphofructo-2-kinase; regulation of glycolysis ↑1.8 (NC) NC ↑1.8 NC 2/2
YFL054C Glycerol transporter ↑1.8 (↑3.5) NC ↑2.0 NC 3/2
YDR001C NTH1 Neutral trehalase; stress response ↑1.8 (NC) NC NC NC 2/2
YPL026C SKS1 Protein kinase; multicopy suppressor of snf3 ↑1.8 (NC) NC NC NC 6/3e
YLR413W Uncharacterized ORF (SGD) ↑1.8 (NC) NC NC NC 1/0
YDL062W Dubious ORF (SGD) ↑1.8 (A) NC NC NC 1
YMR136W GAT2 GATA zinc finger toxin factor ↑1.8 (NC) NC NC NC 2/1
YFR016C Uncharacterized ORF (SGD) ↑1.8 (NC) NC NC NC 0
YKR098C UBP11 Ubiquitin-specific protease ↑1.8 (NC) NC NC NC 4/3
YKR076W ECM4 Cell wall organization ↑1.8 (NC) NC NC NC 7/5f
YLR194C Uncharacterized ORF (SGD) ↑1.8 (↑1.8) NC NC ↓0.3 1/0
YAL061W Putative polyol dehydrogenase ↑1.8 (↑1.7) NC NC NC 1/0
a

Genes whose transcript levels were induced to increase at least 1.8-fold on galactose in a homozygous rgt1Δ/rgt1Δ strain (YM6440) in microarray hybridizations (averages of ratios of mutant spot intensities to wild-type intensities are shown). Boldface type indicates that the ORF or gene was a good candidate for an Rgt1 target (see the text).

b

The ratio of gene transcript levels, determined from hybridization of cellular RNA probes to DNA microarrays, of heterozygous RGT2-1 (YM6554) and SNF3-1 (YM6557) strains grown on galactose and a haploid snf3Δ rgt2Δ strain (YM6370) grown on glucose (Glu) to the gene transcript levels of wild-type (diploid and haploid) strains. The same data from the hybridization of RNA (from an rgt1Δ haploid strain [YM4509] compared to that in the wild type [YM4127] grown in rich 3% glycerol plus 3% lactate medium) to an oligonucleotide array (Affymetrix) are in parentheses. A, Affymetrix hybridization analysis software designated the transcript as being absent; NC, transcript levels that were not changed significantly in the mutant relative to those in the wild type. Symbols: ↑, increased transcript level (≥1.7-fold) in the mutant compared to that in the wild type; ↓, decreased transcript level (≤0.5-fold) in the mutant compared to that in the wild type.

c

Ratio of the number of potential Rgt1 binding sites (CGGANNA) (33) in the promoter to the number of these sites that are conserved in the orthologous promoters of other Saccharomyces species, as described in reference 14.

d

No Rgt1 binding sites lie in the 201 bp between CIT2 and YCR006C (classified as dubious in the SGD), but three potential Rgt1 binding sites lie within 1,200 bp upstream of the CIT2 ATG.

e

Only one Rgt1 binding site is in the intergenic region, but five additional sites lie in the upstream 558-bp ORF (YPL025C, a likely gene since a two-hybrid interaction has been reported between YPL025C and MIG1 [65]).

f

ECM4 and YKR075C are divergently transcribed and so share upstream sequences. These conserved potential Rgt1 binding sites are rather remote from the ECM4 ATG, and the closest three sites are not conserved, so it is doubtful that Rgt1 regulates ECM4 expression.

g

MFS, major facilitator superfamily.