Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 26;63(5):2071–2087. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err408

Table 1.

Subcellular distribution of metabolite levels in developing barley endosperm tissue at 14 DAF

Metabolite Tissue content (nmol g FW−1) Subcellular distribution (%)
Subcellular levels (nmol g FW−1)
Subcellular concentrations (mM)
Cytosol Plastid Cytosol Plastid Cytosol Plastid
Sucrose 75 000.0 91.2±2.9 8.8±2.9 68 432.9±2209.4 6603.2±2209.4 138.248±5.860 13.076±4.505
Fructose 2500.0 82.2±2.7 17.8±2.7 2024.5±65.4 438.4±65.4 4.090±0.173 0.868±0.138
Gluc-1-P 42.2 85.2±5.4 14.8±5.4 36.0±2.3 6.3±2.3 0.073±0.005 0.012±0.005
Gluc-6-P 686.6 87.5±4.2 12.5±4.2 600.7±28.5 85.8±28.5 1.214±0.070 0.170±0.058
Fruc-6-P 152.1 75.5±5.0 24.5±5.0 114.8±7.6 37.3±7.6 0.232±0.018 0.074±0.016
Fruc-1,6-bisP 23.5 91.5±2.3 8.5±2.3 21.5±0.5 2.0±0.5 0.044±0.002 0.004±0.001
DHAP 31.7 95.5±0.0 4.5±0.0 30.3±0.0 1.4±0.0 0.061±0.001 0.003±0.000
GAP 12.8 98.0±0.0 2.0±0.0 12.5±0.0 0.3±0.0 0.025±0.000 0.001±0.000
3-PGA 277.5 85.8±5.3 14.2±5.3 238.1±14.6 39.4±14.6 0.481±0.034 0.078±0.030
PEP 43.7 87.8±0.9 12.2±0.9 38.4±0.4 5.3±0.4 0.078±0.002 0.011±0.001
Pyruvate 61.9 78.8±5.2 21.2±5.2 48.8±3.2 13.1±3.2 0.099±0.007 0.026±0.007
Citrate 1805.2 91.2±4.3 8.8±4.3 1646.3±78.2 158.9±78.2 3.326±0.192 0.315±0.158
Isocitrate 260.0 91.8±3.7 8.2±3.7 238.7±9.6 21.3±9.6 0.482±0.024 0.042±0.019
Oxoglutarate 148.0 93.8±1.7 6.2±1.7 138.8±2.5 9.2±2.5 0.280±0.008 0.018±0.005
Malate 406.3 91.2±2.6 8.8±2.6 370.5±10.6 35.8±10.6 0.749±0.029 0.071±0.022
ADPG 146.0 91.0±2.7 9.0±2.7 132.9±3.9 13.1±3.9 0.268±0.011 0.026±0.008
ATP 258.9 87.2±3.5 12.8±3.5 225.8±9.1 33.1±9.1 0.456±0.023 0.066±0.019
ADP 139.2 33.0±2.9 67.0±2.9 45.9±4.0 93.3±4.0 0.093±0.009 0.185±0.010
AMP 103.4 46.7±5.0 53.3±5.0 48.3±5.1 55.1±5.1 0.098±0.011 0.109±0.011
UDPG 190.9 86.5±2.7 13.5±2.7 165.1±5.1 25.8±5.1 0.334±0.014 0.051±0.011
UTP 120.3 94.2±1.3 5.8±1.3 113.3±1.6 7.0±1.6 0.229±0.006 0.014±0.003
UDP 52.8 83.3±2.7 16.7±2.7 44.0±1.4 8.8±1.4 0.089±0.004 0.017±0.003
UMP 59.6 85.2±2.3 14.8±2.3 50.8±1.4 8.8±1.4 0.103±0.004 0.017±0.003
GTP 91.3 92.8±2.7 7.2±2.7 84.8±2.4 6.6±2.4 0.171±0.007 0.013±0.005
GDP 42.8 93.2±2.3 6.8±2.3 39.9±1.0 2.9±1.0 0.081±0.003 0.006±0.002
GMP 27.9 70.2±4.9 29.8±4.9 19.6±1.4 8.3±1.4 0.040±0.003 0.016±0.003
PPi 70.7 86.8±4.7 13.2±4.7 61.4±3.3 9.3±3.3 0.124±0.008 0.018±0.007
Pi 16 600.0 80.2±4.4 19.8±4.4 13 337.1±729.7 3292.7±729.7 26.944±1.746 6.520±1.509

For three separate gradients deriving from the same pool of tissue, the percentage subcellular distribution of the respective metabolite was calculated. The data shown are the mean ±SE (n=3 different gradients). The levels of the respective metabolite (nmol g FW−1) in cytosol and plastid were calculated by multiplying the tissue content by the percentage subcellular distribution of the respective metabolite for each gradient separately. The obtained values for cytosolic and plastidial metabolite levels from the different gradients were then used to calculate the mean ±SE (n=3 different gradients).

To calculate the subcellular concentration (in μM), the mean subcellular metabolite level was divided by the mean value of the percentage distribution of the respective subcellular volume (see Fig. 2). In this case, both the relative error of the respective metabolite level and that of the subcellular volume distribution were added to show the limits of variation. Cytosol also includes minor contributions of mitochondria and vacuoles that could not be further separated. Data are the mean ±SE (n=3 different experiments).